Comments on: Go easy on the type checking http://labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/ Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:29:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Assaf http://labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-55974 Assaf Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:59:08 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/#comment-55974 oops ... it ate my angle brackets also, there was a <String> in there. let me try and fix it. oops … it ate my angle brackets also, there was a <String> in there. let me try and fix it.

]]> By: Eran http://labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-55815 Eran Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:54:01 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/#comment-55815 Dude! your blog ate my angle brackets! <blockquote> Shouldn’t you be using generics for this? I think the compiler would correctly catch the error if you used ArrayList<Person> (or ArrayList<String>) instead of just ArrayList. </blockquote> Dude! your blog ate my angle brackets!

Shouldn’t you be using generics for this? I think the compiler would correctly catch the error if you used ArrayList<Person> (or ArrayList<String>) instead of just ArrayList.

]]> By: Eran http://labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/comment-page-1/#comment-55814 Eran Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:52:29 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/12/12/go-easy-on-the-type-checking/#comment-55814 Shouldn't you be using generics for this? I think the compiler would correctly catch the error if you used ArrayList (or ArrayList) instead of just ArrayList. Shouldn’t you be using generics for this? I think the compiler would correctly catch the error if you used ArrayList (or ArrayList) instead of just ArrayList.

]]>