<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rounded Corners &#8211; 62</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:29:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mishkin Berteig</title>
		<link>http://labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/comment-page-1/#comment-26981</link>
		<dc:creator>Mishkin Berteig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/#comment-26981</guid>
		<description>And a response to Joel by yours truly:
http://www.agileadvice.com/archives/2006/11/the_case_for_co.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And a response to Joel by yours truly:<br />
<a href="http://www.agileadvice.com/archives/2006/11/the_case_for_co.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.agileadvice.com/archives/2006/11/the_case_for_co.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assaf</title>
		<link>http://labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/comment-page-1/#comment-26975</link>
		<dc:creator>Assaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/#comment-26975</guid>
		<description>Thanks, good link!

When I read the first article, I was thinking unplanned interruptions. They&#039;re extremly disruptive, and they always begin with the fallacy of &quot;just ...&quot;

Joel is talking about multi-tasking. Funny thing, multi-tasking is easy if the interruptions are planned. It&#039;s the unplanned one which, no matter what methodology I used, always wasted more time than &quot;just ....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, good link!</p>
<p>When I read the first article, I was thinking unplanned interruptions. They&#8217;re extremly disruptive, and they always begin with the fallacy of &#8220;just &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Joel is talking about multi-tasking. Funny thing, multi-tasking is easy if the interruptions are planned. It&#8217;s the unplanned one which, no matter what methodology I used, always wasted more time than &#8220;just &#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: engtech</title>
		<link>http://labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/comment-page-1/#comment-26962</link>
		<dc:creator>engtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/11/14/rounded-corners-62/#comment-26962</guid>
		<description>Joel has responsed to Zimine: http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/11/15.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel has responsed to Zimine: <a href="http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/11/15.html" rel="nofollow">http://joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/11/15.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

